QuestionThe China Study, Hallaluya acres, the Gerson Therapy, Hippocrates Institute, Caldwell Essylstyn MD and on and on. Verses Weston Price and other Paleo proponents.
Are they all valid? Can they all "cure cancer"? Is it just the noninflammatory diet they all espouse? Why is raw pastured dairy not always recommended?
My concern is significantly reducing the size/PSA of the prostate.
... Is it true Robert Crayhone died because he switched from a plant based to a paleo diet?
Thanks!!!
AnswerThe Gerson Therapy actually included raw liver among its treatments so wasn't wholly plant-based.
They all have a tiny bit of validity in that the more heavily processed diets incur a much greater chance of cancer. That said, it is already known that wild animals on 100% natural diets in the wild can also get cancer, albeit at much lower rates than humans on junk food diets.
Basically, if you seriously want to get rid of a cancer, you do indeed need to reduce the level of inflammation such as in your dietary-intake. The best way to do this is to eat a raw, palaeolithic diet(dairy, even raw dairy, is often inflammatory, especially since many humans are not evolutionarily adapted to it). The heat-created toxins in cooked foods(specifically advanced glycation end products, heterocyclic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitrosamines) are all well-known to vastly increase the risk of getting cancer due to the inflammation they cause to the body etc. Just google those terms along with "cancer pubmed" or "cancer study" and you should find plenty of scientific references confirming this.
No idea re Robert Crayhorne, never heard of him until now.
HTH,
RPG.
- Prev:Baby Nutrition
- Next:Multiple Sclerosis sufferer